[also in this form: A personal story on cues not quite]
for The Fictional VolunTier Project
by Goura Fotadar
date typed up: 12618
tag[s]: economic research connected criminology, and cue patterns specified again, art abstractions on gender studies and vanities, call reports
theme: gender surgery and its e/a ffects
I was watching as each parks and or leaves exactly at a face-body match when I do. They had told me that I wasn’t hallucinating non-usefully, it’s quite illegal.
[Insert cited; even loosely who that “they” is ] [Check without a citation; based on collected evidence who that it’s not definitely: for example legal verification is never here [through] the local “authorities”]
Collect evidence and-or data also for memory.
[I took a picture]
Assess threat connected to retrieving evidence for verification.
A woman who stalks me nearly everywhere I go and I’m not sure is even female; because she also stalks me in female only scenes; and this is also including: she’s not female and is also not gender inclusive or gender unified; [as in fiction but not]; moaning to herself and guttering objects in my presence, blocking off washing and use-entry segments. The Moaning Continues, uh.
[S/he] Is near. I assess threat, and it’s too dangerous to pull at evidence collector and look/examine picture again. Change assignment as in modify it to use what is. Perhaps retrieve from memory such as in a call report without materials nearby. A practice modifying on further modification call reports for utilize-ability.
[and also in this form: How to create an equivalent gun that I need]
for The Fictional VolunTier Project
By Goura Fotadar
Date typed up: 12018
tag[s]: physics madness, more criminology tools, applications of art practice to the reel whirl
[theme: so I don’t forget]
In non-ordinary combat here called patrol science
use the box [again]
cited: magic/ patrol box
Starting inside box:
- [what is like a gun] effective kill
= right time
Who:how do you know when that is ——- /\ | [right time]
this is the answer to the quantum leap through art : right side can translate to right time
- [Consider filling in the other numbers [uh, refracted by the future completion of this sentence like structure, how many numbers might you want and want et al] the way you would want but that are also dependent on making sense]
[since I might should be able to give it, a brief description of a possible translation explanation; just yes that means placing everything in your surrounding area on the division of right and left sides, and yes, including time on the right in some effective enough method; like even a clock; and that’s it to start with [it]]
[and also in this form: theinvited]
for The Fictional VolunTier Project
By Goura Fotadar
Dedicated to n.c/d and the m.
Date typed up: 11318
Rag/tag[s]: criminology and militia research questions come forth, abstract uh?
He seems almost nice at first; criminal reform candidate a; I suppose if he approached to hang-out even if you hadn’t known him before, you might not be be able to say “no” even if you weren’t sure how much you might benefit from the “hang-out” or enjoy it; it would be a survivable but perhaps not completely safe event circumstance for you the invited. What are as review, things you consider might come up if you were not able to back out of such an invitation:
[past connected to relevant circumstances]
[mental flashes]: then on the experiences that you’ve actually had in the interpretation of your mental flashes, you may want to hypothesize about how to respond to such invitations, in the future.
You might at this stage consider for this criminal reform candidate a why you might not feel comfortable saying “no” to his his invitation. Safe of course and as usual is included in general comfort; and that’s only in general ; as a reference point: is he asking you to an event or a situation which is usually considered a in combat zone, and or combat zone-related area: usually in this country and in this day-age, those are rarer than usual …
In any case, what is it if not forced into some sort of deployment stance: that makes you not believe in actually consenting to the invitation. For this working context: actual consent as you might [[ima]gine[sp?]] means uhm; not having to do and and-or not having to agree to what you obviously don’t agree, to.
Tied between consents, none of which you actually agree to: for example if the local “police department” says that they have to attempt to falsely charge you for a crime, otherwise they will kill you: and you must agree now! to one or the other: you might be going to jail or die: and before anybody of value has been able to response-terms respond; this including the actual police.
[in society: you must wonder why can’t you kill them instead or; and perhaps this is why we have terrorism of the holy and not the unholy matter which is what …]
as an aside to
consider that when danger-type mental flashes are such, realistically come to mind; the approved usual thing to do: is to of course contact the police department and just let them know what you are or might be highly concerned about in terms of danger in such a situation: the only problem is that in a time of militia escalated terrorism; and that means terrorism toward the actualized militia including identity theft; calling a regular general and advanced-specific police and-or police-like # may not prove as it was at least in this society temporarily safe to do so: and purging before. And hence we have, why we might need an adjunct invention and research.
The point is actual-ized militia may not be able to respond to calls despite still working; their roles may have also adapted to other facets of police/militia work; with the former effective method to contact them perhaps [is?] only one facet of expansive and entire police/militia work possibilities. Thus, much like during times of cited: P.O.W.[s]; when they can’t be contacted and are instead in semblance replaced in communication with unholy terrorists; another invention or more is needed likely in the same line. ]
A safety producing
proof based on basic/of basic safety might be: now to turn what’s happened ill-ly by the “police” and as against the police; into the police and an [at least one] actualized “police” …
versus police and conversion to also “police”
To “police” (right) in reg. culture on this side of the sphere conversion … (so taking into account culturally accessible [sp?] provisions)
Conversion usually refers to religious enterprise, and-or avenue: of course “police” in this contextual quotation version
would mean no reg. recruitment for such work:
And so if in the case
So “police” (wrong)
In order and
… followed to conversion
You would take people
In, not, police recruitment;
And not in false police recruitment:
Who had been in the (wrong)
As depicted actually in society,
And not necessarily
So for example: society’s
Era when there is
A prison system for those that have done wrong; such as reform prison;
Even if they are not charged for the exact wrongs
[the swing of the un-necessary of charging in the area of where charge matters less and not not]
… but are charged for some wrong, as they have done wrong; with perhaps less application for those in the system of wrong who haven’t or less use; but instead of bummer: perhaps they will have other applications
and uses from wrong if place-d in the system of wrong.
So in the system of wrong, captured and seanced away from otherwise right and-or correct society: in this era-time most commonly known as reform prison [and not the other version of arrest un-reforming]
Where there is a conversion process in a such demarcated system
already conversion in our current
culture usually conversion refers to religion:
and in at least the last 10 years starting at like a minus four from now year:
there has been mention
of conversion within
the prison system
to renowned faith [s]
Unfortunately, even before considering whether this systemized transfer from outside culture works in the sense; we or rather I am looking for: we must find the “police” in a changing in this case system of wrong toward right. What may qualify as “police” in such a system:
and how might you qualify is the likely the 1st [set? Of] significant research questions: (based on) for this practice I am going to base it on : …
What I’ve observed in/on the “police” (wrong) at the outside of prison scenarios:
-low comprehension of self gender and relational gender; even for outter/other actualized
-poor body placement: and positioning as compared to nearby structures (and beings: structures)
-excessive stalking and poor body zone-ing especially in relation to others [i.e. in the case of the latter]
-non-comprehension of clearly marked and depicted resources and despite repeated access to study and utilization of such resources
example, include[s]: telling homeless people on-the: street that there are open shelters for them to go to now and nearby, and when the case is: it is, has been announced declared that all shelters are criminally prohibited from being used due to out-of-control safety and destructive torture techniques: and that all actual? shelter “staff” has-have been fired and arrested.
theme: where is actual shelter #staff# ?
and this was announced especially to the homeless population
-demonstrating use of false power such as 51/50s, arrests, and ticketing, vehicles and weapons, and uniforms; and threats of such power
-inability to psychologically differentiate between self and others in general example test[s]: include generic images of self compared to generic images of other[s] under oath; and if such images are correctly identified and then incorrectly used [in the future] charge-ing of identity theft and identity theft associations.
*variated for the blind [obvious additions]
forms of terrorism:
Requesting to meet you in person and-or to meet with you in person, and not acceptably accepting “no” for an answer, screaming out privileged information about youi n public and-or forcing you to do so, asking for your confidential personal information whenever and inappropriately
and the worth
of institutions et al
having given them out,
plagiarizing parts of your career in your un-schedule-d conversation, taking pictures and videos of you during such enforced interaction and additionally plagiarizing your image or people connected to you [-’s] image staging fake arrests in your path and yelling out your name during such arrests, repeatedly banning you from places for standing up for your civil rights and especially places/locations you might own or have an owning: stake in.
Rough and Quick: Nancy a reminder of definitions of syntax, parameters and other funny pics. & thought-notes
[and also in this form: Nancy ]
for The Fictional VolunTier Project
By Goura Fotadar
tag[s]: rapid and not barely thought out word diagrams
In art a re-iteration with a mild shift: from the fiction blog: [not-al?]
Like pancy but that’s not how it’s uh spell-ed
Like fancy [checked, and here the first version non discriminated version of pansy; and an exercise in art of discrimination would be to create the first version or something like create, and capture edifices of imagine-translated discrimination to have at least [a] more of a viewing point of what is seen]
Ok. Nancy is like fancy, but for the n and the f,
n=f when in what’s that called in elem s’cool? consonants
n,f are consonants
[con, son, ants] [if spelled correctly or correctly enough]
n: f through [con, son, ants]
n [con, son, ants] f
[con, son, ants] = : [at least in one variety] maybe not maybe; that’s obvious
If pancy is not how it’s spelled but the cliché and-or unpopular but usual meaning of the word similar or close enough or exactly sounding,
con, son, ants
Your son is a daughter and actually a female may not need the same p,ants from pancy [pansy] [and in the first derivation; on fashion notes; and this is following the part two citation; flower pants]
and are you the con, or is she: he, or is it both,
And what does this have to do with fancy, well usually nancy regularly references a name: and so perhaps your son that is actually female and a daughter has a fancy name; criminology strikes again; because
who,ever [of the one, two, and so on …]
, which,ever is practicing the con, is it a legal con, and if not what is it enforcing to happen,
[a further fashion solution is, flower pants that might fit male[s] meaning mail[uh?] and are designed more specifically for male gender][and as a relevant cultural check just on guess check are flower pants still used primarily female-wise where of course wise just means application, the transition to part two; or almost transition]
Part two. I looked it up and what where is the meaning; it nancy means “grace”
cited: found and if even temporary definitions,
nancy = grace
[perhaps insert help or something like help from above or part one unlabeled , right but depicted as part one.]
(n=f)ancy = grace
n=f = g
It really is a girl/female/woman [on quick applied guess from part one’s semi-proof]
Perhaps the significance of g as the additional identifier might need to be kept and so g now refers to a development period for traditional uses of gender: female of youth; but for not traditional uses of gender an application of youth form development derived through one gender and such quickly applied from unlabeled but depicted part one
Then of course you can pull out: (girl) … [for now, anyhow]
and ancy=race (well, as controlled by girl) [then quickest; if necessary whatever you see, and-or whatever can be scene; as in the latter here in brackets, identified] of course ansy sounds so much like anse which seems to have the opposite meaning as used regularly in cliché and or pop culture
cited: meaning [where on look up anse means “handle”]
and then on verification anse used popularly is actually spelled for now according to a cited check: antsy
fidgety=race [right, because in case you don’t know what antsy means regularly in regular culture, that’s what]
and so we have:
(girl)fidgety=(girl)race and of course this implies if you see or have s[c]ene a person fidgety during a race; and perhaps not the other usual definition of the word race looked at here anyway; no it means that a race is an experience in/of effective fidgeting; and one way to realize this is through the development process of girl, at least that’s how nancy means “grace” and the part of what about anse meaning “handle” also meaning race with the same derivation of girl factor, is then how you might make the jump from handle to fidgety and or handling to fidgeting or such, and then you would have something like how it is that in current conditions these two are the same under the condition of race while through lens girl [and this is a very rough draft of thought-notes]
[and also in this form: On personal experience]
for The Fictional VolunTier Project
By Goura Fotadar
Date typed up, this part: 1418
On personal experience:
If the surveillance videos are
Checked and compared the
Personal reports and-or
Reports can be
Confirmed or not;
And the ability to check
Them to confirm
Report has to
Do with [12.26.17]
Actual militia role
Versus false militia role.
But what of a connecting
Actual militia rolewhere access to
Certain militia (false m.r. with access to a.r. rights and-or false rights)
Not pertaining to regular
Job and-or accessible.
A directive to militia
Roles where such
Necessary resource per case
May be accessible; and accessibly used; then the perchance
opportunity / that a
Report in any form/form[s]
is provided reverse
Entry/ and exit out;
A cue check for the the
Match between the given
At especially 1st call
And the report collected heard
By militia group accessible [sp?]
Of/to something , a thing
Such as surveillance
Footage; creates a static state
Of the point in report.
What might be the worth of a static state?
you say your gramma is not that nice of an old lady; that she used to harm you with irons and she would again if she could.
[theme: we need more reporting agencies through elevated collection system; perhaps adjoined together in different parts.]
If you had such ability to call such a reporting agency; and … aside:
surveillance [sp?] (1) at the basic step;
[i.e. how do we ensure who reports calling in has earned that ability]
Sigma notation: earned report = efficacy no stealing || a hope for such vicissitude||
perhaps in count points
Just thinking about it:
If we break up each
Potential report into stems
The any species debutante
That would be enunciated
Or effectively enunciated
We might ear/n the
Ability to report 1: based on our near future stems, 2: now; why not too far into the future stems.
This in any case would be earned by qualifying the stems to at least schematic hypotheses of what is itself ostensibly significant and-or important in general? and maybe relative to reporting?
In either or any case; how might you hypothesize: what is significant and-or important as a stem in reporting:
-a ringer again: truth, and-or the equivalent truth: (think about locative significance, and-or locative, value)
For example in whatever hypoxy is: [?] you call something or some service to create a report; and later as in magic: ther eis a location validation if even not connected seemingly to the reporting/ type service.
such as in the cited: wolf, game ? [or however it that game’s story is spelled]
Or whatever it’s called if in that version of feral danger: even those not physically close to you, would be able to come get you: in such type, needing of assistance, and experience: danger, etc.
Let’s say in the general case: you hear screaming in the street: and you decide it must be reported: You’re the person, who heard the screaming and instead of seeing if somebody else will report it either through a pass on and-or a waiting: you decide to report it to a reporting agency because they exist. [basic safety and technological evaluations: which one exists now for sure.]
You call the this reporting agency and you leave a message:
The message, sounds something like this:
“My name is Ursu Tanner. I heard screaming on the cross street Dwight in Berkeley, CA. It is now 9 p.m. I heard the screaming only a short while ago and it sounded like more than one person screaming.”
[refracted in message ß] time now [when heard message]: “9 pm” “short while ago” :
9:00 p.m. – “short while ago”
= approx. … 9: 00 p.m.
= time of real incident
time now = stated /reported time in recording/ message/ report – “short while ago” = reported time
Real world check of closest now time to reported time
In that time zone pick at least one location or as many as affordability to: that match aspects or equivalents to aspects of the report description …
And either do a/n [an actual] basic patrol at one matching location and-or assign, such.
the stem approximation:
Or the stems approximation:
If the patrol?
Results in either sustaining
No [unjust, non-reforming] crime or controlling [this version as approximated]
Crime to lessen it
And-or to reform it to
Justice followed as closely within a margin high like starting at 90% match of
Instructions from report. [i.e. what are the instructions from for example this made-up report]
If [actual, actualized and not fake] patrol is
performed in match cognition not close enough at a second mat/ch of 100% level with no margin change; follows another version of stems; or a version of stems: and fulfills the previous two criteria [one or the other is fine] the caller has earned reporting rights; and can call in a report; without stealing
But all of this “stuff” almost aside which might be the stems of the call: (report left) [using this example]
stem: name/person/identity called
stem: witnessed scene
stem: calculated and or witnessed internal time
[and see what happens]
In more detail, perhaps:
Stem: 1 person called in
Stem: a cross street, Dwight, CA.
Stem: heard more than one screaming
Stem: 9:00 – short while ago = 9:00
Follow through with real-world check [how? Might you do this]
Reference, Source Citation Text: David Finkel, Thank You For Your Service