criminology research

Instead of Gossip, Personal or rather work-related Crime Report; to be adjunct, ed in my next upcoming publication and-or book. [i.e. if I don’t get arrested for being uh, what is that they are saying: wrong for society]

Posted on Updated on

————————-by Goura Fotadar for The Fictional VolunTier Project on 12918———— [also in this form: Instead of Gossip]

o

Addressed Now: To the Superior Court of Santa Clara County

& also to the Attorney General & Civil Rights Unlimited Containers

& regarding the death of my primary deceased brother, and others like him; [send to, places where his identity is still being used illegally]

theme: are eugenics projects real; can the dead be revived? [non-fic? reality, sci-fi advantage]

 

  1. Eviction Detainer

First the eviction detainer is illegal. I left the property I was held hostage in; as is reported and caught in a report:

Here identified

 

While hostage still as of late 2016; when I called the court, they suggested that I stay on property longer since I needed to be handed a legal document to actually be evicted. IN addition I was not a renter on property; where I was nearly raped and also repeatedly threatened with violent death. Instead I was a no living wage worker; hoarded mostly in one room, where those who held me hostage, repeatedly requested my consent to the use of my brother’s identity, who was at that time verified to either be deceased in combat and or missing in action; they had however been using his identity in a form of heinous identity theft since he were a young child; and now as a member of the united states military likely dead, they were even getting married in his name; and honeymooning so. The situation of his identity theft had become very public with imposters of these hostage holders and their family and terrorist connections such as the cult they adhere to: known as Satya Sai Baba; repeatedly publicly arrested for using his identity and not just in the years that he deployed overseas.  Next the hostage holders reported to me that they were living off of compensation for my no living wage work and my birth trusts as they were also child kidnappers of me and my brother [at least as the reported and identified to me; apparently convicted that no consequence Correct existed for their actions Wrong]; and wanted power of authority over my identity also along with what they believe what were my doj clearances. They attempted a seize maneuver of me with the local corrupt police department in Santa Clara County; but I think it has been verified that I have criminal immunity or something; it’s not like I have the clear ability to verify this any longer[?] And or if such thing existence exista.

IN any case; the man that is named on the eviction detainer; attempted to rape me with his coordinating “wife” in the household in exchange while he used and dealt illicit drugs with his “wife” and their contacts. He then interacted repeatedly with an imposter of my brother’s identity as if it were still my brother and the imposter’s as reported by them newlywed wife; requiring that I also identify this imposter as my brother. I filed paperwork using the same name of my brother which this imposter I believe is still using; years past my brother’s death and pretending of all things to be a non-civilian militia member who served purpose of service in action to our country. Perhaps due to this and or due to the fact that I was being held hostage; the hostage holders especially the one of were put on repeat one day public arrests and followed around by a white vehicle in the neighborhood where they held me hostage; the other whoever the real cops are were looking for; but for some reason could not find? IN any case, I put myself on a protective hold indirectly by filing those papers and instead was informed that I was going to be court martial ordered for my service to this country as a veteran. I am however not a veteran of regular military service in this generation of regular combat war that was the brother they are still impostor-ing. The police were unable to seize me so they forced me to go with one of the hostage holders to a hospital where I was placed on the protective hold for protection to my own life; and additionally court martial ordered without my consent and illegally; the hostage holders then tried to claim that I was an alcoholic who suffered from bipolar disorder along with the main staff of the hospital and that I deserved to be institutionalized for life my career ended. Otherwise, the hostage holders wanted to change my career from leader of the cited: C.I.A. to a caregiver for them and others as they chose; somebody they described who could wash them or others. Though I found this suggestion to be preposterous; the hospital staff and their conductors believed this was a very reasonable request. They also believed that I was hallucinating that I were a writer; and that I had no self-established with company support of any such writing career. They continued to deny that I had attended college and or graduate school; and instead continued in a form of unjust retaliation that I were had been institutionalized my entire life; and that I had perhaps only been held hostage; because clearly I did not know how to hygiene myself. They evaded the situation of my brother’s identity theft; or that these hostage holders were child kidnappers of mine, and in fact not even my actualized and or in other variety real family. At the end of the c.m. I was let go; and found myself to an estate given five years of estate: church living for the homeless needing protection and or otherwise disenfranchised from mainstream society in some way despite the height of their performance or not; and the child kidnappers and the san jose police department followed me there; despite it says in your court record, giving me an eviction detainer [which I never exactly received in legal form; and only recently checked to see if anything such bizarre were up based on a feeling; how absurd] mandating me to leave the property I was on hostage on; and they [uh. who is.] attempted to have me gang-raped. This was very non-entertaining to me and I fled to the street for sovereignty in my own country in essentially victimized refugee status; where they police continued to barbarically manhunt me cross space from food stores and yes I’d bet you’d like to know using my now cited: e.b.t card; of course in hostage, I was starved to the convenience of my hostage holders. I forgot just one necessary criminal mention, that the hostage holders also decided to let me know that they had some of my original relatives and members of the military also hostage; in locations I wouldn’t guess; of course I could hardly remember most of my original family; since I had been kidnapped with my brother in final attempt at a very young age to my new assignment, you might call it; or ours.

IN the last many weeks to months [in reverse order], the police have attempted sometimes five to 10 seizes of me per day; and this is from city to city in a proximity distance. Many onlookers knowing that I am obviously not an internationally known unjust and otherwise qualified unjust terrorist have not understood why. Well, here is the reason why: I am born into the position of acting leader of the cited: C.I.A. along with some other organizations; I am responsible for all militia enactment since the time of my birth through the mystery of being a cited: C.I.A. operative. I for example must decide who actually makes it to staff on courthouse, fire departments, libraries, and police departments, and anywhere really. So you can see that I did not consent to hiring such “police officers” and want them fire-d and charged with genocide of my identity: race, education, career, other training, actualized family and relations, and my general efficacy in for example the world; something it is clear to every surveillance video where they especially stalk and harass me with all of their unwarranted weapons simply outperforms them. I also want your courthouse shut down, permanently; and all of your staff to never be re-hired anywhere. You have demonstrated in my opinion severe incompetence and unjust support of an unjust and faulty nonsensical “police departments” and such bogus “staff”. Their performance is a laughing and public joke; which I do not find funny at all; and an enormous insult to actual police officers and not just alone.

 

II> [1.24.18] Criminal Citation for being a “Public Nuisance” and-or also known as homeless outside.

On the early morning of one of the recent days after a thanksgiving feast for the homeless; the weather had turned back to rainy start season. Having been forced from my former two rest spots by the cited: Menlo park police department and and their defense of two people pulling a gun on me; as I mentioned I’m a cited: C.I.A. operative since birth and also hold other militia titles; though I am by practice a civilian and do not carry weapons.

I was under the front part of the roof of the post office on Hamilton [Palo Alto] due to rain conditions, and the “police” approached me twice under these circumstances. Officer Enborg/Enberg also approached me earlier at the cited: Palo Alto Public Library’s park while I ate my soup kitchen/charity soup at one of that specific in location library’s park benches. He said that somebody had called the police about a woman yelling near some bridge that I had never heard of; and his partner said to him that they needed to strip search me because I was too tall to be a woman.

It’s true my height has varied drastically throughout the course of my life; but I’ve had many severe violent injuries during the course of my life [I grew up in a heavily violent home where I was regularly violently beaten with weapons and jumped indoors]. When I thought of how absurd this was; the request of a strip search of me while I ate soup in the park, and as a homeless woman who earns approx. $0.10/year for my 10-15 hour workdays approx. 7 days a week; the “cops” continued with Enborg/Enberg wanting to know if I owed any money.

The police identified themselves as being exactly like the cited: Menlo Park Police Department; on that night and then on the night of Post Office Incident; the main cop: Enborg/Enberg admitted that he clearly believed and understood that sleeping in front of a Post Office meant that it was a federal building and this meant that I had lodging? He was so sure that this qualified as lodging that he wouldn’t stop yelling in my face at is it 1 something in the morning; while a small group of onlookers watched; when I negated his false definition of lodging; i.e. he attributed that he was sure that sleeping outside that I had my own property in that rest spot; and surely he was more intelligent than me; along with this time his two other partners.  When I told them that this spot absolutely did not qualify as a house as he was describing and that I was not indoors in rest-nights anywhere and with accompanying inside placed storage, he moved away, and continued; with the other homeless people in the area. But first him and his two coordinating staff were absolutely obviously sure in the dimwitted ness of what does not qualify them and or disqualifies them from any militia role inclusive of police officers; that there was an essence matter of my height to be determined and that the only thing that mattered in this interaction were if Enborg/Enberg were taller than me. If you don’t believe me check the surveillance tapes. It was among the most absurd police interactions I have ever not just witnessed but also been enforced to interact in. I don’t think the police officers in the area and authorities understand that despite being homeless on the streets, I work about 10-15 hours a day and for pennies per year. This is a major and significant issue when you disturb not just my life, but also my work and sleep schedule to tote your own ego in an intergender beauty competition with me; that first of all I have not consented to. Your local cops have a localized extreme version of non-focus and something like lustful attraction crush on me; when they can’t get me to provide them with sexual favors; for god’s sake I am not a hooker; and if even I were their solicitations of me in the many variety are getting out of control; with “Officer” Mazon’s [M.P. but since Enborg/Enberg claims you to be the same p.d.] attempt to get me to give him a blow job in public and I just ignored and moved on from that situation; otherwise he was going to issue me another citation. [If you don’t believe me listen to surveillance.]

I understand that I have been signed up for modeling since birth as an operative; some of the many public images of me reduced in variety to assemble to the regular public; and others displaying my exact appearance; with my name disguised most often; but you must understand that these revenue to charity for the public and are not my fault that my image is used to pay for uh things; and never actually my own expenses. This I believe is a situation involved with the regard of the local police officers who keep calling me other names as they approach me; and literally won’t leave me alone.  It’s dangerous when their lustful conditions term them to cite and stalk me as if I were a non-reforming criminal on-the run. Instead I earned California state sheriff several years ago; on my old job in emergency response dealing with suicide and homicide; and this was my last regularly paid position with low pay soon before I soon deployed myself as a homeless person and such; and all of this as a civilian-like and with no weapons. I think you don’t understand that I was told from a much higher up outside agency that this position goes with me; and I am non-sanctioned though actually hired in this position; that means I don’t carry a weapon. This makes me the boss of all police officers in the area especially; and not the other way around. I was further told that I am the only singular CA state sheriff; and that this will likely not change; in any case you are driving around in vehicles with literally one of my job titles on them; and without my consent; while you attempt to charge me as a criminal and arrest me. I wonder if you organized-ly understand the tier system of work; and how beneath me the local police are in work competence; and how much off of my work and identity they are living. If you don’t believe me about making this qualification and working this title alongside my other work; why not check surveillance recordings from my old job.

Back to the night of the citation; the night continued on with the three officers from where I could see slamming one body over and over again of somebody sleeping who were homeless outside that night; attempting to slam another body, and attempting to molest the third body. As a result, I got on the phone and called the local police station; who told me that I was not allowed to call the police station; and hanging up on me; I made the cops stop molesting and slamming bodies around me; and they then issued me a citation. [If you don’t believe me check surveillance videos.]

Additional charges for these “cops” and their phone response team: are requesting my brother’s identity for their work; now deceased my brother was in a militia role at the time of this death; and his identity has been severely experiencing severe identity theft for the past several years; and on-and-off his whole life. Days before another “cop” from your force was present asking me if he could use my brother’s identity to do a job that he didn’t deserve. I said no. In addition; I must add; that I was kidnapped repeatedly but as an operative and not as a regular child who experienced kidnapping taken away from my regular family in cited: c.i.a. operations; with one of my brothers to go into my assignment family; but the others including cousins went to other families. All of my relatives are in militia roles whether as civilians or not; and more than one of them of the regular militia in addition to higher militia have had and are still experiencing,

Identity theft; along with of course lots more victims and in general.

When I called the police station to ask them to please ask their cops to stop harming and harassing homeless people unjustly; they hung up on me as I might have mentioned. The next day they said that they were going to put me under arrest for using a police number at all; the same story as the Menlo Park Police Department. I don’t think you understand that my position puts me at the highest level of power of authority; and it goes the other way around in terms of arrest:  I want them under arrest for their unjust violence, stalking, and in general harassment of various freedoms. It has gotten past absurd. I also want you to understand that this form of power of authority is non-transferable. It means that if I were to for example die; it would go with me; and not to some local low level barely functional police department stealing from the public and Society, at least American in general; that I have never consented to hire as anything especially for god’s sake, cops.

I also want a work charge against these “police departments” and connecting “authorities” since they continue to infiltrate my work and hinder it; in addition to doing the same with my existence and identity.

Perhaps of even further scrutiny all three “officers” admitted to me on the night of citation; that they were on illicit substances; I am already attending recovery courses for other illicit drug users; and these are actually mandated to recover from addiction, unhealthy and-or illicit; I can’t be harassed by people posing as officers and not qualifying while they are on illicit drugs in the middle of the night and especially while homeless on the street; it is ungodly to start with and is highly criminal of them in the variety non-reforming to end with.

I am livid that despite these infractions from them and their coordinatings; that you would further request me to once again to show up in court again to deal with yet another faulty police department in another section of the faulty justice system, and while I receive no payment for such reporting work. How much of an infringement of my worker’s rights.

 

Signed Under Oath to the best of My Recollection,

And must be affirmed and verified by actualized consented to checks of all surveillance pertaining to the incidents disclosed here.

 

Goura Fotadar

1.25.18, 1.29.18

Untitled

 

Advertisements

A personal story on cues not quite; translated to the basic word re-imaging.

Posted on

[also in this form: A personal story on cues not quite]

Untitled

for The Fictional VolunTier Project

by Goura Fotadar

date typed up: 12618

tag[s]: economic research connected criminology, and cue patterns specified again, art abstractions on gender studies and vanities, call reports

 

theme: gender surgery and its e/a ffects

I was watching as each parks and or leaves exactly at a face-body match when I do. They had told me that I wasn’t hallucinating non-usefully, it’s quite illegal.

[Insert cited; even loosely who that “they” is ] [Check without a citation; based on collected evidence who that it’s not definitely: for example legal verification is never here  [through] the local “authorities”]

Collect evidence and-or data also for memory.

[I took a picture]

Assess threat connected to retrieving evidence for verification.

A woman who stalks me nearly everywhere I go and I’m not sure is even female; because she also stalks me in female only scenes; and this is also including: she’s not female and is also not gender inclusive or gender unified; [as in fiction but not]; moaning to herself and guttering objects in my presence, blocking off washing and use-entry segments. The Moaning Continues, uh.

 

[S/he] Is near. I assess threat, and it’s too dangerous to pull at evidence collector and look/examine picture again. Change assignment as in modify it to use what is. Perhaps retrieve from memory such as in a call report without materials nearby. A practice modifying on further modification call reports for utilize-ability.

How to create an equivalent gun that I need / desire

Posted on Updated on

[and also in this form: How to create an equivalent gun that I need]

for The Fictional VolunTier Project

By Goura Fotadar

Date typed up: 12018

tag[s]: physics madness, more criminology tools, applications of art practice to the reel whirl

 

Date 11918

[theme: so I don’t forget]

In non-ordinary combat here called patrol science

use the box [again]

cited: magic/ patrol box

Untitled

 

Starting inside box:

  1. [what is like a gun] effective kill

= right time

Who:how do you know when that is ——- /\ | [right time]

this is the answer to the quantum leap  through art : right side can translate to right time

aqu

  1. [Consider filling in the other numbers [uh, refracted by the future completion of this sentence like structure, how many numbers might you want and want et al] the way you would want but that are also dependent on making sense]

[since I might should be able to give it, a brief description of a possible translation explanation; just yes that means placing everything in your surrounding area on the division of right and left sides, and yes, including time on the right in some effective enough method; like even a clock; and that’s it to start with [it]]

The Invited

Posted on Updated on

The Invited

[and also in this form: theinvited]

 

for The Fictional VolunTier Project

By Goura Fotadar

Dedicated to n.c/d and the m.

Date typed up: 11318

Rag/tag[s]: criminology and militia research questions come forth, abstract uh?

 

Date: 1.7.18

He seems almost nice at first; criminal reform candidate a; I suppose if he approached to hang-out even if you hadn’t known him before, you might not be be able to say “no” even if you weren’t sure how much you might benefit from the “hang-out” or enjoy it; it would be a survivable but perhaps not completely safe event circumstance for you the invited. What are as review, things you consider might come up if you were not able to back out of such an invitation:

[past connected to relevant circumstances]

[mental flashes]: then on the experiences that you’ve actually had in the interpretation of your mental flashes, you may want to hypothesize about how to respond to such invitations, in the future.

You might at this stage consider for this criminal reform candidate a why you might not feel comfortable saying “no” to his his invitation. Safe of course and as usual is included in general comfort; and that’s only in general ; as a reference point: is he asking you to an event or a situation which is usually considered a in combat zone, and or combat zone-related area: usually in this country and in this day-age, those are rarer than usual …

combat

In any case, what is it if not forced into some sort of deployment stance: that makes you not believe in actually consenting to the invitation. For this working context: actual consent as you might [[ima]gine[sp?]] means uhm; not having to do and and-or not having to agree to what you obviously don’t agree, to.

Tied between consents, none of which you actually agree to: for example if the local “police department” says that they have to attempt to falsely charge you for a crime, otherwise they will kill you: and you must agree now!  to one or the other: you might be going to jail or die: and before anybody of value has been able to response-terms respond; this including the actual police.

[in society: you must wonder why can’t you kill them instead or; and perhaps this is why we have terrorism of the holy and not the unholy matter which is what …]

[1.11.18

as an aside to

consider that when danger-type mental flashes are such, realistically come to mind; the approved usual thing to do: is to of course contact the police department and just let them know what you are or might be highly concerned about in terms of danger in such a situation:  the only problem is that in a time of militia escalated terrorism; and that means terrorism toward the actualized militia including identity theft; calling a regular general and advanced-specific police and-or police-like # may not prove as it was at least in this society temporarily safe to do so: and purging before. And hence we have, why we might need an adjunct invention and research.

The point is actual-ized militia may not be able to respond to calls despite still working; their roles may have also adapted to other facets of police/militia work; with the former effective method to contact them perhaps  [is?] only one facet of expansive and entire police/militia work possibilities. Thus, much like during times of cited: P.O.W.[s]; when they can’t be contacted and are instead in semblance replaced in communication with unholy terrorists; another invention or more is needed likely in the same line. ]

 

A safety producing

proof based on basic/of basic safety might be: now to turn what’s happened ill-ly by the “police” and as against the police; into the police and an [at least one] actualized “police” …

“police” (wrong)

versus police and conversion to also “police”

(right) (a-1)

“police” (wrong)

Conversion

To “police” (right) in reg. culture on this side of the sphere conversion … (so taking into account culturally accessible [sp?] provisions)

Conversion usually refers to religious enterprise, and-or avenue: of course “police” in this contextual quotation version

would mean no reg. recruitment for such work:

1.8.18

And so if in the case

Of (wrong)

So “police” (wrong)

Almost inverted

In order and

Then separated

(wrong) “police”

… followed to conversion

You would take people

In, not, police recruitment;

And not in false police recruitment:

Who had been in the (wrong)

As depicted actually in society,

And not necessarily

As charged

So for example: society’s

Era when there is

A prison system for those that have done wrong; such as reform prison;

Even if they are not charged for the exact wrongs

[the swing of the un-necessary of charging in the area of where charge matters less and not not]

… but are charged for some wrong, as they have done wrong; with perhaps less application for those in the system of wrong who haven’t or less use; but instead of bummer: perhaps they will have other applications

and uses from wrong if place-d in the system of wrong.

So in the system of wrong, captured and seanced away from otherwise right and-or correct society: in this era-time most commonly known as reform prison [and not the other version of arrest un-reforming]

1.9.18

Where there is a conversion process in a such demarcated system

society

as described,

already conversion in our current

culture usually conversion refers to religion:

and in at least the last 10 years starting at like a minus four from now year:

there has been mention

of conversion within

the prison system

to renowned faith [s]

Unfortunately, even before considering whether this systemized transfer from outside culture works in the sense; we or rather I am looking for: we must find the “police” in a changing in this case system of wrong toward right. What may qualify as “police” in such a system:

and how might you qualify is the likely the 1st  [set? Of] significant research questions: (based on) for this practice I am going to base it on : …

What I’ve observed in/on the “police” (wrong) at the outside of prison scenarios:

-low comprehension of self gender and relational gender; even for outter/other actualized

-poor body placement: and positioning as compared to nearby structures (and beings: structures)

1.12.18

-excessive stalking and poor body zone-ing especially in relation to others [i.e. in the case of the latter]

-non-comprehension of clearly marked and depicted resources and despite repeated access to study and utilization of such resources

example, include[s]: telling homeless people on-the: street that there are open shelters for them to go to now and nearby, and when the case is: it is, has been announced declared that all shelters are criminally prohibited from being used due to out-of-control safety and destructive torture techniques: and that all actual? shelter “staff” has-have been fired and arrested.

theme: where is actual shelter #staff# ?

and this was announced especially to the homeless population

-demonstrating use of false power such as 51/50s, arrests, and ticketing, vehicles and weapons, and uniforms; and threats of such power

un-necessarily

-inability to psychologically differentiate between self and others in general example test[s]: include generic images of self compared to generic images of other[s] under oath; and if such images are correctly identified and then incorrectly used [in the future] charge-ing of identity theft and identity theft associations.

*variated for the blind [obvious additions]

-practicing other

forms of terrorism:

Requesting to meet you in person and-or to meet with you in person, and not acceptably accepting “no” for an answer, screaming out privileged information about youi n public and-or forcing you to do so, asking for your confidential personal information whenever and inappropriately

and-or denying

your credentials

and the worth

of institutions et al

having given them out,

 

plagiarizing parts of your career in your un-schedule-d conversation, taking pictures and videos of you during such enforced interaction and additionally plagiarizing your image or people connected to you [-’s] image staging fake arrests in your path and yelling out your name during such arrests, repeatedly banning you from places for standing up for your civil rights and especially places/locations you might own or have an owning: stake in.

Rough and Quick: Nancy a reminder of definitions of syntax, parameters and other funny pics. & thought-notes

Posted on

[and also in this form: Nancy ]

for The Fictional VolunTier Project

By Goura Fotadar

Date: 1618,1718

tag[s]: rapid and not barely thought out word diagrams

In art a re-iteration with a mild shift: from the fiction blog: [not-al?]

 

Like pancy but that’s not how it’s uh spell-ed

Like fancy [checked, and here the first version non discriminated version of pansy; and an exercise in art of discrimination would be to create the first version or something like create, and capture edifices of imagine-translated discrimination to have at least [a] more of a viewing point of what is seen]

Ok. Nancy is like fancy, but for the n and the f,

n=f when in what’s that called in elem s’cool? consonants

n,f are consonants

[con, son, ants] [if spelled correctly or correctly enough]

n: f through [con, son, ants]

n [con, son, ants] f

[con, son, ants] = : [at least in one variety] maybe not maybe; that’s obvious

If pancy is not how it’s spelled but the cliché and-or unpopular but usual meaning of the word similar or close enough or exactly sounding,

Then,

con, son, ants

Your son is a daughter and actually a female may not need the same p,ants from pancy [pansy] [and in the first derivation; on fashion notes; and this is following the part two citation; flower pants]

and are you the con, or is she: he, or is it both,

And what does this have to do with fancy, well usually nancy regularly references a name: and so perhaps your son that is actually female and a daughter has a fancy name; criminology strikes again; because

who,ever [of the one, two, and so on …]

, which,ever is practicing the con, is it a legal con, and if not what is it enforcing to happen,

[a further fashion solution is, flower pants that might fit male[s] meaning mail[uh?] and are designed more specifically for male gender][and as a relevant cultural check just on guess check are flower pants still used primarily female-wise where of course wise just means application, the transition to part two; or almost transition]

Part two. I looked it up and what where is the meaning; it nancy means “grace”

cited: found and if even temporary definitions,

nancy = grace

[perhaps insert help or something like help from above or part one unlabeled , right but depicted as part one.]

(n=f)ancy = grace

(n=f)ancy= (g)race

n=f = g

It really is a girl/female/woman [on quick applied guess from part one’s semi-proof]

Perhaps the significance of g as the additional identifier might need to be kept and so g now refers to a development period for traditional uses of gender: female of youth; but for not traditional uses of gender an application of youth form development derived through one gender and such quickly applied from unlabeled but depicted part one

So:

(girl)ancy=(girl)race

Then of course you can pull out: (girl)   … [for now, anyhow]

and ancy=race (well, as controlled by girl) [then quickest; if necessary whatever you see, and-or whatever can be scene; as in the latter here in brackets, identified] of course ansy sounds so much like anse which seems to have the opposite meaning as used regularly in cliché and or pop culture

so

cited: meaning [where on look up anse means “handle”]

handle=race

and then on verification anse used popularly is actually spelled for now according to a cited check: antsy

fidgety=race [right, because in case you don’t know what antsy means regularly in regular culture, that’s what]

and so we have:

(girl)fidgety=(girl)race and of course this implies if you see or have s[c]ene a person fidgety during a race; and perhaps not the other usual definition of the word race looked at here anyway; no it means that a race is an experience in/of effective fidgeting; and one way to realize this is through the development process of girl, at least that’s how nancy means “grace” and the part of what about anse meaning “handle” also meaning race with the same derivation of girl factor, is then how you might make the jump from handle to fidgety and or handling to fidgeting or such, and then you would have something like how it is that in current conditions these two are the same  under the condition of race while through lens girl [and this is a very rough draft of thought-notes]

 

suh.png

nancy

braces

braces2

 

 

 

 

The next part of the tree itself/ Book a

Posted on Updated on

The next part of the tree itself

for The Fictional VolunTier Project

By Goura Fotadar

Date typed up, this part: 1518

[also in this form: Later at one of our temporary kidnapped shacks I came downstairs one]

 

 

I believe our primary names were kept; our birthyear difference kept in the right order: but our actual birthdates changed to make us legally older; my race was kept my brother’s changed to mine; and our genders and birth-places were kept in-tact. [uh, I mean on paper documents et al]

But maybe one assumes I am non-usefully hallucinating and that this can’t be true! In any case

later at one of our temporary kidnapped shacks I came downstairs one-day to see my brother then approx. 3-4 years old with his hands tied with ropes: because of what a group of adult child kidnappers said: [was/is] his real ethnic race. They had already set-up one imposter at least; who was glee-fully watching as my brother was trying to eat dinner with his hands tied. What did I do at this rancid

discovery; I’d rather not say why hadn’t the 3-4 year old brother told me? We were quite close. Like a pop-song the imposter was screaming “Call me … (his name)” “I’m your brother now” Years later though the tie-ing up halted: my brother’s hands were permanently damaged by the ropes. The “parent” and such couldn’t remember if he were born with such damaged hands; but we could remember the shift from his normal toddler hands to his mutilated hands; and this was especially an identifying discrepancy; I’m sure with digital imaging it would be easy to conceal that: mutilation. But as the years in childhood went on; art became something me and my brother were not enthusiastic about; and it’s an interesting story of trauma recovery because I’m a non-paid in money artist, now. So much of art in childhood expected and demanded the use of one’s normal hands; without such a set; and with cognition of him missing such a set; regular art never became our childhood thing. [Well, regular art only; and to start with only, I wouldn’t want to fib and claim that I didn’t create irregular forms of art in my childhood; the type that was less dependent on the regular birth privilege of not being mutilated by abuse and-or emotionally connected to such mutilating abuse.]

In this case the perpetrators of such actions would be charged for both children one would be as described [charge: enforcing into violating physical deformity through mutilation as an unjust response to racism and prejudice: so the enactment of elevated racism and prejudice with the intention to create a depiction of re-generating undeserved homicide] ; and the other would something like match. (as traumatized through witness). [back to main:]

The star of course has been mentioned in the I believe the first set of this posting or something; and in connection to child trauma: it would precipitate authorities not believing in a child, or such child’s potential; and enforcing that disbelief to as: reality. Then; perhaps at least attempting to perpetuate this against actualized accomplishment

12.8.17

In the child the child turning adult, and the adult who used to be a child: and then in this case: the star is an extremely interesting reality euphemism; defining something like the reaching of an otherwise un-reachable a generally

stage; to still not be high enough for an abusive traumatizer : to sway away from the incorrect dis-belief a reality they’ve cemented perhaps such that the culminating child receives the message he/she/that is not capable of a thing of worth, substance, et al; even at the outside sky’s star elevation.

The thing about this ornament piece is also a reminder of the actual seen star; and how it might be possible to become enough like one; [or a?].

For example: in metaphysics or something or metaphysical counseling trauma, combat actions to recovery; imagine translating into reality what that actual star-like existence; like-stars existences; for the uniqueness of stars? would equivocate to in the non-sky version of the world. Likely equivocate to the translated reality version of star;

Would restrict the ability of traumatic abusers from infiltrating an in[n]correct disbelief reality into/onto and as abuse of an innocent victim; traumatizing; and after such trauma if the star-path is only then accessible and-or available for entry: it poses as an ability to eviscerate such incorrect disbelief

realit[-ies] for one’s self.

Usually, I believe: in these type of star studies: but can’t exactly recall you look for star qualities.

In definitions of solidarity; you might look at star similarities. You might for example write a translation formula; even; a basic one of conversion to general her[e] reality.

 

Outside box but coherent in relative knowledge; a

formula may be the conception of book;

The proof for book[s]; [as a comparison, perhaps]

 

12.9.17 The obvious thing would be usual structure or form of a book; as witnessed; in this case especially: a front & a back , and I suppose everything in the center or middle: something like a passage. When comparing like to stars: I don’t know my guess would be something like a reflection with at least first, and second incidence or sight; and perhaps between this [these] incidences and-or/and/or reflections is passage. If time were not relevant it might be instead the work it takes to go from 1st to 2nd incidence. And as a book equivalent: what it either —-à it takes to go from start to finish or how one flips from start to finish; or perhaps in some cases both: passages, version of passages; and-or centers are required.

I’m not sure but I think this would; noticing with the invention of book[s] be some beginning star-equivalent; in translation

startheory

each book while moving

from its front to back;

is an experienced passage

and-or journey; such as life, death, college, etc.;

a career, et al

In I believe the second version; if one wanted to transpire various passages and or journeys when entering the examination of book arts; a simple flip from front cover to back cover would encompass the flip as the center /passage

|

\/

for that might not need to be internal

the situation may also imply retrieval:

example:

Book a: incidence
/ 1

Step 1 [front cover]

Possible retrieval effective equal

To front cover sight such as book title

Step 2 external to book or this translated to reality star a flip to the back cover

Step 3 incidence 2/ [back cover] or retrieval possible effective equal to back cover sight such as back cover hue/. Main design or something.

The quasi-question and or relational question might be in another version outter space or something reality: how do you after incidence 1st sight turn or effectively equivalently turn a star over; and is that a modality of invention: strength

Reflecting on yesterday’s war as if it’s still today’s war: [part two]\

Posted on Updated on

[and also in this form: On personal experience]

for The Fictional VolunTier Project

Untitled

By Goura Fotadar

Date typed up, this part: 1418

 

On personal experience:

If the surveillance videos are

Checked and compared the

Personal reports and-or

Reports can be

Confirmed or not;

And the ability to check

Them to confirm

Report has to

Do with [12.26.17]

Actual militia role

Versus false militia role.

But what of a connecting

Actual militia rolewhere access to

Certain militia (false m.r. with access to a.r. rights and-or false rights)

Resource is

Not pertaining to regular

Job and-or accessible.

A directive to militia

Roles where such

Necessary resource per case

May be accessible; and accessibly used; then the perchance

opportunity / that a

Report in any form/form[s]

is provided reverse

Entry/ and exit out;

A cue check for the the

Match between the given

Personal report/report

At especially 1st call

And the report collected heard

By militia group accessible [sp?]

Of/to something , a thing

Such as surveillance

Footage; creates a static state

Of the point in report.

What might be the worth of a static state?

(1)-truth:

you say your gramma is not that nice of an old lady; that she used to harm you with irons and she would again if she could.

[theme: we need more reporting agencies through elevated collection system; perhaps adjoined together in different parts.]

If you had such ability to call such a reporting agency; and … aside:

surveillance [sp?] (1) at the basic step;

.

.

.

report collected

[i.e. how do we ensure who reports calling in has earned that ability]

Sigma notation: earned report = efficacy no stealing || a hope for such vicissitude||

perhaps in count points

Just thinking about it:

If we break up each

Potential report into stems

The any species debutante

That would be enunciated

Or effectively enunciated

We might ear/n the

Ability to report  1: based on our near future stems, 2: now; why not too far into the future stems.

This in any case would be earned by qualifying the stems to at least schematic hypotheses of what is itself ostensibly significant and-or important in general? and maybe relative to reporting?

In either or any case; how might you hypothesize: what is significant and-or important as a stem in reporting:

-a ringer again: truth, and-or the equivalent truth: (think about locative significance, and-or locative, value)

For example in whatever hypoxy is: [?] you call something or some service to create a report; and later as in magic: ther eis a location validation if even not connected seemingly to the reporting/ type service.

such as in the cited: wolf, game ? [or however it that game’s story is spelled]

Or whatever it’s called if in that version of feral danger: even those not physically close to you, would be able to come get you: in such type,  needing of assistance, and experience: danger, etc.

 

12.28.17

Let’s say in the general case: you hear screaming in the street: and you decide it must be reported: You’re the person, who heard the screaming and instead of seeing if somebody else will report it either through a pass on and-or a waiting: you decide to report it to a reporting agency because they exist.  [basic safety and technological evaluations: which one exists now for sure.]

 

You call the this reporting agency and you leave a message:

[updated 123117]

The message, sounds something like this:

“My name is Ursu Tanner. I heard screaming on the cross street Dwight in Berkeley, CA. It is now 9 p.m. I heard the screaming only a short while ago and it sounded like more than one person screaming.”

 

[refracted in message ß] time now [when heard message]: “9 pm” “short while ago” :

9:00 p.m. – “short while ago”

= approx. … 9: 00 p.m.

= time of real incident

 

So, review

time now = stated /reported time in recording/ message/ report – “short while ago” = reported time

Real world check of closest now time to reported time

In that time zone pick at least one location or as many as affordability to: that match aspects or equivalents to aspects of the report description …

And either do a/n [an actual] basic patrol at one matching location and-or assign, such.

 

the stem approximation:

Or the stems approximation:

Earned reporting

12.30.17

If the patrol?

Results in either sustaining

No [unjust, non-reforming] crime or controlling [this version as approximated]

Crime to lessen it

And-or to reform it to

Justice followed as closely within a margin high like starting at 90% match of

Instructions from report.  [i.e. what are the instructions from for example this made-up report]

If [actual, actualized and not fake] patrol is

performed in match cognition not close enough at a second mat/ch of 100% level with no margin change; follows another version of stems; or a version of stems: and fulfills the previous two criteria [one or the other is fine] the caller has earned reporting rights; and can call in a report; without stealing

12.31.17

But all of this “stuff” almost aside which might be the stems of the call: (report left) [using this example]

stem: name/person/identity called

stem: location

stem: witnessed scene

stem: calculated and or witnessed internal time

[and see what happens]

à

In more detail, perhaps:

Stem: 1 person called in

Stem: a cross street, Dwight, CA.

Stem: heard more than one screaming

Stem: 9:00 – short while ago = 9:00

|

\/

Follow through with real-world check [how? Might you do this]

 

Reference, Source Citation Text: David Finkel, Thank You For Your Service