The Invited

Posted on Updated on

The Invited

[and also in this form: theinvited]


for The Fictional VolunTier Project

By Goura Fotadar

Dedicated to n.c/d and the m.

Date typed up: 11318

Rag/tag[s]: criminology and militia research questions come forth, abstract uh?


Date: 1.7.18

He seems almost nice at first; criminal reform candidate a; I suppose if he approached to hang-out even if you hadn’t known him before, you might not be be able to say “no” even if you weren’t sure how much you might benefit from the “hang-out” or enjoy it; it would be a survivable but perhaps not completely safe event circumstance for you the invited. What are as review, things you consider might come up if you were not able to back out of such an invitation:

[past connected to relevant circumstances]

[mental flashes]: then on the experiences that you’ve actually had in the interpretation of your mental flashes, you may want to hypothesize about how to respond to such invitations, in the future.

You might at this stage consider for this criminal reform candidate a why you might not feel comfortable saying “no” to his his invitation. Safe of course and as usual is included in general comfort; and that’s only in general ; as a reference point: is he asking you to an event or a situation which is usually considered a in combat zone, and or combat zone-related area: usually in this country and in this day-age, those are rarer than usual …


In any case, what is it if not forced into some sort of deployment stance: that makes you not believe in actually consenting to the invitation. For this working context: actual consent as you might [[ima]gine[sp?]] means uhm; not having to do and and-or not having to agree to what you obviously don’t agree, to.

Tied between consents, none of which you actually agree to: for example if the local “police department” says that they have to attempt to falsely charge you for a crime, otherwise they will kill you: and you must agree now!  to one or the other: you might be going to jail or die: and before anybody of value has been able to response-terms respond; this including the actual police.

[in society: you must wonder why can’t you kill them instead or; and perhaps this is why we have terrorism of the holy and not the unholy matter which is what …]


as an aside to

consider that when danger-type mental flashes are such, realistically come to mind; the approved usual thing to do: is to of course contact the police department and just let them know what you are or might be highly concerned about in terms of danger in such a situation:  the only problem is that in a time of militia escalated terrorism; and that means terrorism toward the actualized militia including identity theft; calling a regular general and advanced-specific police and-or police-like # may not prove as it was at least in this society temporarily safe to do so: and purging before. And hence we have, why we might need an adjunct invention and research.

The point is actual-ized militia may not be able to respond to calls despite still working; their roles may have also adapted to other facets of police/militia work; with the former effective method to contact them perhaps  [is?] only one facet of expansive and entire police/militia work possibilities. Thus, much like during times of cited: P.O.W.[s]; when they can’t be contacted and are instead in semblance replaced in communication with unholy terrorists; another invention or more is needed likely in the same line. ]


A safety producing

proof based on basic/of basic safety might be: now to turn what’s happened ill-ly by the “police” and as against the police; into the police and an [at least one] actualized “police” …

“police” (wrong)

versus police and conversion to also “police”

(right) (a-1)

“police” (wrong)


To “police” (right) in reg. culture on this side of the sphere conversion … (so taking into account culturally accessible [sp?] provisions)

Conversion usually refers to religious enterprise, and-or avenue: of course “police” in this contextual quotation version

would mean no reg. recruitment for such work:


And so if in the case

Of (wrong)

So “police” (wrong)

Almost inverted

In order and

Then separated

(wrong) “police”

… followed to conversion

You would take people

In, not, police recruitment;

And not in false police recruitment:

Who had been in the (wrong)

As depicted actually in society,

And not necessarily

As charged

So for example: society’s

Era when there is

A prison system for those that have done wrong; such as reform prison;

Even if they are not charged for the exact wrongs

[the swing of the un-necessary of charging in the area of where charge matters less and not not]

… but are charged for some wrong, as they have done wrong; with perhaps less application for those in the system of wrong who haven’t or less use; but instead of bummer: perhaps they will have other applications

and uses from wrong if place-d in the system of wrong.

So in the system of wrong, captured and seanced away from otherwise right and-or correct society: in this era-time most commonly known as reform prison [and not the other version of arrest un-reforming]


Where there is a conversion process in a such demarcated system


as described,

already conversion in our current

culture usually conversion refers to religion:

and in at least the last 10 years starting at like a minus four from now year:

there has been mention

of conversion within

the prison system

to renowned faith [s]

Unfortunately, even before considering whether this systemized transfer from outside culture works in the sense; we or rather I am looking for: we must find the “police” in a changing in this case system of wrong toward right. What may qualify as “police” in such a system:

and how might you qualify is the likely the 1st  [set? Of] significant research questions: (based on) for this practice I am going to base it on : …

What I’ve observed in/on the “police” (wrong) at the outside of prison scenarios:

-low comprehension of self gender and relational gender; even for outter/other actualized

-poor body placement: and positioning as compared to nearby structures (and beings: structures)


-excessive stalking and poor body zone-ing especially in relation to others [i.e. in the case of the latter]

-non-comprehension of clearly marked and depicted resources and despite repeated access to study and utilization of such resources

example, include[s]: telling homeless people on-the: street that there are open shelters for them to go to now and nearby, and when the case is: it is, has been announced declared that all shelters are criminally prohibited from being used due to out-of-control safety and destructive torture techniques: and that all actual? shelter “staff” has-have been fired and arrested.

theme: where is actual shelter #staff# ?

and this was announced especially to the homeless population

-demonstrating use of false power such as 51/50s, arrests, and ticketing, vehicles and weapons, and uniforms; and threats of such power


-inability to psychologically differentiate between self and others in general example test[s]: include generic images of self compared to generic images of other[s] under oath; and if such images are correctly identified and then incorrectly used [in the future] charge-ing of identity theft and identity theft associations.

*variated for the blind [obvious additions]

-practicing other

forms of terrorism:

Requesting to meet you in person and-or to meet with you in person, and not acceptably accepting “no” for an answer, screaming out privileged information about youi n public and-or forcing you to do so, asking for your confidential personal information whenever and inappropriately

and-or denying

your credentials

and the worth

of institutions et al

having given them out,


plagiarizing parts of your career in your un-schedule-d conversation, taking pictures and videos of you during such enforced interaction and additionally plagiarizing your image or people connected to you [-’s] image staging fake arrests in your path and yelling out your name during such arrests, repeatedly banning you from places for standing up for your civil rights and especially places/locations you might own or have an owning: stake in.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s